Ohms: pre-release hype thread

[RaptureWS]

why would they do the billboard AND the website reveal if it wasn't the artwork. makes about 0 sense. Anyone can come here and say things as if they know.

I'm with you at the moment.

Probably right, but then again, the billboard doesn't name the band or the album. It's only a billboard for hardcore fans. It's not really an "ad" IMO. The billboard show the top half of the pic being revealed this week. Not the bottom half though. The bottom half could still be missing almost everything and change the entire context. IDK, just speculation

[There Will Be Blood]

Two more hours.

[Roidragee]

3 more hours. Watch 

[RaptureWS]

Think rebirth. Not dark.

Chino mentioned as much in the Kerrang article. Anyone could have read the article and made this statement. I want to believe you so much though. I think I will believe you actually. It makes me happy to think an insider, possibly even a band member, is here among us

[stinkfist]

So... A woman's crying face on a beach with circuits and a moth on top... and dolphins in the background? Am I missing something?

[thatdeftkid]

So... A woman's crying face on a beach with circuits and a moth on top... and dolphins in the background? Am I missing something?

Yes

[buflen]

why would they do the billboard AND the website reveal if it wasn't the artwork. makes about 0 sense. Anyone can come here and say things as if they know.

I'm with you at the moment.

Probably right, but then again, the billboard doesn't name the band or the album. It's only a billboard for hardcore fans. It's not really an "ad" IMO. The billboard show the top half of the pic being revealed this week. Not the bottom half though. The bottom half could still be missing almost everything and change the entire context. IDK, just speculation

the billboard has much more dots on it than on the website. Since the website reveals, only dots has been added, not removed. i fully expect the album art to be all with dots with just a few dark dots (the eyes). if this art is not even used it would have been a crazy amount of wasted time for the marketing team.

[RaptureWS]

So... A woman's crying face on a beach with circuits and a moth on top... and dolphins in the background? Am I missing something?

Yes

lol, man I thought I was done altering the image in Piccy. Nope. I'm gonna keep at it until I see something that isn't a face

[buflen]

Think rebirth. Not dark.

Chino mentioned as much in the Kerrang article. Anyone could have read the article and made this statement. I want to believe you so much though. I think I will believe you actually. It makes me happy to think an insider, possibly even a band member, is here among us

I am a nigerian prince and I want to give you 10 million dollars. If you send me your bank information.

[stinkfist]

So... A woman's crying face on a beach with circuits and a moth on top... and dolphins in the background? Am I missing something?

Yes

And I was so close!

[Formant]

why would they do the billboard AND the website reveal if it wasn't the artwork. makes about 0 sense. Anyone can come here and say things as if they know.

I'm with you at the moment.

Probably right, but then again, the billboard doesn't name the band or the album. It's only a billboard for hardcore fans. It's not really an "ad" IMO. The billboard show the top half of the pic being revealed this week. Not the bottom half though. The bottom half could still be missing almost everything and change the entire context. IDK, just speculation

the billboard has much more dots on it than on the website. Since the website reveals, only dots has been added, not removed. i fully expect the album art to be all with dots with just a few dark dots (the eyes). if this art is not even used it would have been a crazy amount of wasted time for the marketing team.

Also, I don't know anything about how much it costs to put up a billboard; but I don't think there would be so much effort, money, and time put into putting one up all for it to not be album art.

[RaptureWS]

@thatdeftkid-Should I just chill and enjoy the ride, or continue running this image through contrast/color/saturation filters?

[Suq Madiq]

Emizzlevandizzle commented on some black and white photos of people in the ocean on frankmaddocks IG. "Somebody talked..." they both work for Warner if I'm not mistaken. Connection?

[RaptureWS]

Think rebirth. Not dark.

Chino mentioned as much in the Kerrang article. Anyone could have read the article and made this statement. I want to believe you so much though. I think I will believe you actually. It makes me happy to think an insider, possibly even a band member, is here among us

I am a nigerian prince and I want to give you 10 million dollars. If you send me your bank information.

I asked Santa for 10 mil and he said he would do his best. Nigeria is poor keep your money buddy Can you send me an agbada with a bunch of dots on it though?

[LG95]

Emizzlevandizzle commented on some black and white photos of people in the ocean on frankmaddocks IG. "Somebody talked..." they both work for Warner if I'm not mistaken. Connection?

Post is from five hours ago.

[thatdeftkid]

@thatdeftkid-Should I just chill and enjoy the ride, or continue running this image through contrast/color/saturation filters?

Too late to enjoy the ride. Already going down the rollercoaster.

[sharinglungs]

why would they do the billboard AND the website reveal if it wasn't the artwork. makes about 0 sense. Anyone can come here and say things as if they know.

I'm with you at the moment.

Probably right, but then again, the billboard doesn't name the band or the album. It's only a billboard for hardcore fans. It's not really an "ad" IMO. The billboard show the top half of the pic being revealed this week. Not the bottom half though. The bottom half could still be missing almost everything and change the entire context. IDK, just speculation

the billboard has much more dots on it than on the website. Since the website reveals, only dots has been added, not removed. i fully expect the album art to be all with dots with just a few dark dots (the eyes). if this art is not even used it would have been a crazy amount of wasted time for the marketing team.

Also, I don't know anything about how much it costs to put up a billboard; but I don't think there would be so much effort, money, and time put into putting one up all for it to not be album art.

Between $2-10,000

[buflen]

why would they do the billboard AND the website reveal if it wasn't the artwork. makes about 0 sense. Anyone can come here and say things as if they know.

I'm with you at the moment.

Probably right, but then again, the billboard doesn't name the band or the album. It's only a billboard for hardcore fans. It's not really an "ad" IMO. The billboard show the top half of the pic being revealed this week. Not the bottom half though. The bottom half could still be missing almost everything and change the entire context. IDK, just speculation

the billboard has much more dots on it than on the website. Since the website reveals, only dots has been added, not removed. i fully expect the album art to be all with dots with just a few dark dots (the eyes). if this art is not even used it would have been a crazy amount of wasted time for the marketing team.

Also, I don't know anything about how much it costs to put up a billboard; but I don't think there would be so much effort, money, and time put into putting one up all for it to not be album art.

Between $2-10,000

2$ for the cheapest one? good deal`!

[sharinglungs]

Lol $2000

[LG95]

Announce the album and put us all out of our misery.