Koi No Yokan thread

[kckondor]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review? Other than ATF is like Diamond Eyes?

[Playhouse]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review? Other than ATF is like Diamond Eyes?

Theres quite a lot you can get from this review if you read it.

[Inkblades]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review?

Imminent cannon battles. Also, Deftones might win the Nobel prize.

[gwenudo]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review? Other than ATF is like Diamond Eyes?

Theres quite a lot you can get from this review if you read it.

I had to read it 3 times to understand him more .. i had a mindfuck though the first time so dontt feel left out lol

[xLhabiax]

Awesome but i cannot STAND METALSUCKS i fucking HATE AND DETEST that site. People are full of shit, I remember back in 03 the meatheads on there would bash deftones and lump them in with LB and Linkin Park, and they bashed chino when he was mad that they had to open up for linkin park and limp bizkit.

Assholes, man I'm telling you.

Straight neanderthals.

The turds at Blabbermouth do the same thing, they have a very small (and i mean small) window of heavy music they like and they simply shit on everything else. I usually just ignore it or if i'm in the mood i just tell them how clever they are with lines like "Five Finger Cock Brunch" or "Fag Fuckers Donkey Punch" in the comment section on the story about FFDP, and just for the record im not defending said band it's just a lot of fun to mock their supposed creativity.

[kckondor]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review? Other than ATF is like Diamond Eyes?

Theres quite a lot you can get from this review if you read it.

I guess I just prefer the track by track type reviews better.  The review completely left out half the album.  No mention of the opener,  or how the studio versions of Poltergeist and Rosemary sounds.  No mention of Romantic Dreams either.  For a review that seemed to hit on the flow of the album, they sure did leave out quite a few songs.

[gwenudo]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review?

Imminent cannon battles. Also, Deftones might win the Nobel prize.

LMFAOO xD

[gwenudo]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review? Other than ATF is like Diamond Eyes?

Theres quite a lot you can get from this review if you read it.

I guess I just prefer the track by track type reviews better.  The review completely left out half the album.  No mention of the opener,  or how the studio versions of Poltergeist and Rosemary sounds.  No mention of Romantic Dreams either.  For a review that seemed to hit on the flow of the album, they sure did leave out quite a few songs.

Im sure later on today or this week we'll have a better review with in depth song to song review cause yea they pretty much sucked on this review ... good news is the press has the album now!! Woo! Leak leak leak!

[m1nusblindfoLd]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review? Other than ATF is like Diamond Eyes?

Theres quite a lot you can get from this review if you read it.

I guess I just prefer the track by track type reviews better.  The review completely left out half the album.  No mention of the opener,  or how the studio versions of Poltergeist and Rosemary sounds.  No mention of Romantic Dreams either.  For a review that seemed to hit on the flow of the album, they sure did leave out quite a few songs.

It's pretty ridiculous to leave out mentioning of songs on an album of this length....

[kckondor]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review? Other than ATF is like Diamond Eyes?

Theres quite a lot you can get from this review if you read it.

I guess I just prefer the track by track type reviews better.  The review completely left out half the album.  No mention of the opener,  or how the studio versions of Poltergeist and Rosemary sounds.  No mention of Romantic Dreams either.  For a review that seemed to hit on the flow of the album, they sure did leave out quite a few songs.

Im sure later on today or this week we'll have a better review with in depth song to song review cause yea they pretty much sucked on this review ... good news is the press has the album now!! Woo! Leak leak leak!

Do you think they actually have the album now, or they are finally able to report their thoughts from the listening party last month?

[DenOndaNissen]

After reading that review im super stoked! Could this album be their no.1 masterpiece?

[gwenudo]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review? Other than ATF is like Diamond Eyes?

Theres quite a lot you can get from this review if you read it.

I guess I just prefer the track by track type reviews better.  The review completely left out half the album.  No mention of the opener,  or how the studio versions of Poltergeist and Rosemary sounds.  No mention of Romantic Dreams either.  For a review that seemed to hit on the flow of the album, they sure did leave out quite a few songs.

Im sure later on today or this week we'll have a better review with in depth song to song review cause yea they pretty much sucked on this review ... good news is the press has the album now!! Woo! Leak leak leak!

Do you think they actually have the album now, or they are finally able to report their thoughts from the listening party last month?

Knowing these guys bashing on deftones a long time ago, i doubt they wouldve had the privlage to go to such an amazing party lol

[dictatesofreason]

every album is a masterpiece

[Mothman]

every album is a masterpiece

THIS.

[chuckles]

every album is a masterpiece

THIS.

No hay duda!

[jciraheta]

we it seem that this album is going to major kick ass

i don want to get my expectations that high but when they put this album on white pony level , seem that is going to be very good

[Jacob]

Does anybody actually get anything from this review? Other than ATF is like Diamond Eyes?

Theres quite a lot you can get from this review if you read it.

I guess I just prefer the track by track type reviews better.  The review completely left out half the album.  No mention of the opener,  or how the studio versions of Poltergeist and Rosemary sounds.  No mention of Romantic Dreams either.  For a review that seemed to hit on the flow of the album, they sure did leave out quite a few songs.

It's pretty ridiculous to leave out mentioning of songs on an album of this length....

nah man, I liked the interview simply because it left out detailed descriptions of the songs. it talked about the album on a whole, both in comparison to their earlier work and as a stand-alone album. it mentioned songs in a way that peaks your interest, without spoiling them and giving away too much. a review isn't meant to describe an album in detail, it's supposed to give people the general idea and help them decide wether they might like it or not, plus create hype and discussion. which I think this review did perfectly. I don't want to know every little details about the songs before I hear them, and this review only made me fantasize more about the different sounds and concepts it may contain.

[only pieces remain]

that reviewers brains are a tad scrambled i'd say. idk wtf he was talking about for 75% of the damn review. Hopefully this gets the ball rolling though.

[alan1o]

weird review. he seems to wither around and use lots of metaphors to describe things. he fails to mention which tracks are the heavier ones,
he compares diamond eyes to around the fur - what the fuck ?
he says they have the same track order - what the fuck does that mean ? they go up incrementally by 1 each time?

either way, it's quite clearly a positive review so i'm just as anxious for the album as i was before

[Jacob]

he fails to mention which tracks were the heavier one

why would he mention that? that's only interesting to the hardcore fans who hang around a forum discussing which songs might be heavy and which ones might not.